Vonage
vs
Plivo
?
Looking for which SMS provider will be the best for your use case among
Vonage
vs
Plivo
?
Compare
Vonage
vs
Plivo
head-to-head on factors such as their
features, pricing, latency, deliverability and more.
Looking for which SMS provider will be the best for your use case among
Vonage
vs
Plivo
?
Compare
Vonage
vs
Plivo
head-to-head on factors such as their
features, pricing, latency, deliverability and more.
Introducing
Vonage vs Plivo (2023)
,
two industry leading SMS vendors that are transforming the way businesses connect with their audience
Vonage's SMS API helps you create customer journeys through conversations—even within the context of your app. With it's private SMS communication, your users can seamlessly and safely book appointments, confirm deliveries, and more. Check more details.
In a market flooded with SMS providers, selecting the one that suits your needs can be challenging. This comparative guide offers a swift overview of their offerings, making it easy for you to decide.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Not Supported
Not Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Supported
Not Supported
Not Supported
Supported
Supported
Every choice comes with its trade-offs. Let's break down the advantages and disadvantages of the providers for a clear decision making.
Vonage API provides an array of extended features to manage SMS and voice calls, enhancing communication capabilities.
The API offers fast delivery response, ensuring messages reach recipients promptly and reliably.
Users appreciate the competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective choice for SMS and voice communication needs.
The platform is user-friendly, and the API documentation provided is excellent, making it easy to integrate with different programming languages.
Vonage is praised for its stability and reliability, ensuring a seamless communication experience for businesses.
Some users find the dashboard confusing and difficult to use, especially during API integration.
A few users have found the initial API integration process to be somewhat intimidating, which may require a learning curve.
Users have requested more flexibility in billing options, such as providing the billing in USD instead of Euro.
The cost of sending SMS to some countries, especially in the Middle East, has been highlighted as relatively expensive.
Some users have mentioned the need for better analytics capabilities to track and analyze communication data effectively.
Plivo offers a robust and easy-to-use API for Voice and SMS communication. This makes it a good choice for developers who want to integrate communication features into their applications.
Plivo offers flexible BYOC (Bring Your Own Carrier) options, which allows businesses to use their own carriers for voice and SMS traffic. This can save businesses money on their communication costs.
Plivo supports a diverse range of local numbers, which makes it a good choice for businesses that want to reach customers in multiple countries.
Plivo offers competitive pricing for its services. This makes it a good choice for businesses on a budget.
Plivo's user interface is easy to use and navigate. This makes it a good choice for businesses of all sizes.
Some users have reported that Plivo's customer support is not as responsive or helpful as they would like.
Plivo may not offer as many advanced features as some of its competitors. This could limit its appeal for certain use cases.
Plivo has been the victim of several security breaches in recent years. This has raised concerns about the security of its platform.
Vonage API provides an array of extended features to manage SMS and voice calls, enhancing communication capabilities.
The API offers fast delivery response, ensuring messages reach recipients promptly and reliably.
Users appreciate the competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective choice for SMS and voice communication needs.
The platform is user-friendly, and the API documentation provided is excellent, making it easy to integrate with different programming languages.
Vonage is praised for its stability and reliability, ensuring a seamless communication experience for businesses.
Some users find the dashboard confusing and difficult to use, especially during API integration.
A few users have found the initial API integration process to be somewhat intimidating, which may require a learning curve.
Users have requested more flexibility in billing options, such as providing the billing in USD instead of Euro.
The cost of sending SMS to some countries, especially in the Middle East, has been highlighted as relatively expensive.
Some users have mentioned the need for better analytics capabilities to track and analyze communication data effectively.
Plivo offers a robust and easy-to-use API for Voice and SMS communication. This makes it a good choice for developers who want to integrate communication features into their applications.
Plivo offers flexible BYOC (Bring Your Own Carrier) options, which allows businesses to use their own carriers for voice and SMS traffic. This can save businesses money on their communication costs.
Plivo supports a diverse range of local numbers, which makes it a good choice for businesses that want to reach customers in multiple countries.
Plivo offers competitive pricing for its services. This makes it a good choice for businesses on a budget.
Plivo's user interface is easy to use and navigate. This makes it a good choice for businesses of all sizes.
Some users have reported that Plivo's customer support is not as responsive or helpful as they would like.
Plivo may not offer as many advanced features as some of its competitors. This could limit its appeal for certain use cases.
Plivo has been the victim of several security breaches in recent years. This has raised concerns about the security of its platform.
Don't just take our word for it. Hear directly from users on G2 who have used
Vonage
and
Plivo
firsthand
The Vonage API has an extended features to manage SMS, Voice Calls using the API provided by Vonage API. The API always has a quick delivery response & transition routes. The Vonage dashboard looks clumsy and it always makes me feel difficult about integrating the API. It can be much easy & the User Experience should be simplified.
Small Business Owner
The documentation is very easy for our developers to understand and integrate within our platform. When we have questions or need assistance, we are able to get direct support. When it comes to support tickets, due to the way we are structured, sometimes it can route to the wrong team.
Platform Experience
Plivo is a pretty easy platform to understand, especially with a background of working at a SaaS company. Plivo is our chosen SMS provider for our advocate/supporter activation texts - I haven't had any need to reach out to support, though, so I can't comment on their customer service level. Similarly to most SaaS softwares, there are SO many ways to do the same thing.
SaaS Customer Success Enablement
I like the simplicity. Plivo has a lot of docs, integration libraries and ways to use in business and life scenarios. And this makes it awesome tool for everyday tasks (like call forwarding) and for real business cases (like complex ivrs and so on). It not related to Plivo, but sometimes there are issues with sms A numbers, ability to change call A numbers, but it's all about call providers, and service cannot be responsible for that.
Software Engineer
Check out the SMS vendor comparison between Bandwidth vs Gupshup based on parameters such as features, cost, pricing, security, reliability, latency and more.
Check out the SMS vendor comparison between Bandwidth vs Exotel based on parameters such as features, cost, pricing, security, reliability, latency and more.