Looking for which Email provider will be the best for your use case among
SendGrid
vs
Amazon SES
?
Compare
SendGrid
vs
Amazon SES
head-to-head on factors such as their
features, pricing, latency, deliverability and more.
Introducing
SendGrid
vs
Amazon SES
,
two industry leading Email vendors that are transforming the way businesses connect with their audience
A scalable, reliable email service for transactional & marketing emails. High deliverability, robust analytics, & easy integrations. G2 rating: 4/5.
A scalable, reliable email service for transactional & marketing emails. High deliverability, robust analytics, & easy integrations. G2 rating: 4/5.
In a market flooded with Email providers, selecting the one that suits your needs can be challenging. This comparative guide offers a swift overview of their offerings, making it easy for you to decide.
/v3/user/webhooks/
N/A
/v3/user/webhooks/event
/v2/email/configuration-sets/ConfigurationSetName/event-destinations/
/v3/marketing/contacts
/v2/email/contact-lists/
/v3/mail/send
/v2/email/outbound-emails
Docs
Docs
Clickfunnels, Cloudfront, GoDaddy, Airtable, AWS + 116
Paypal, Drupal, Typeform ++
Yes
Yes
/v3/user/webhooks/
N/A
/v3/user/webhooks/event
/v2/email/configuration-sets/ConfigurationSetName/event-destinations/
/v3/marketing/contacts
/v2/email/contact-lists/
/v3/mail/send
/v2/email/outbound-emails
Docs
Docs
Clickfunnels, Cloudfront, GoDaddy, Airtable, AWS + 116
Paypal, Drupal, Typeform ++
Yes
Yes
Every choice comes with its trade-offs. Let's break down the advantages and disadvantages of the providers for a clear decision making.
SendGrid ensures dependable email delivery, reducing bounce rates and enhancing customer communication.
User-friendly interface and clear documentation simplify integration.
Dynamic content personalization improves targeting and engagement.
Real-time performance tracking with open rates, click-through rates, and more aids optimization.
SendGrid's infrastructure efficiently handles variable email volumes.
Considered expensive, especially for dedicated servers.
Initial setup may be challenging for non-technical users.
Improved design features are desired.
Slow or unresponsive support at times.
Issues with email delivery to specific providers, causing spam marking.
Amazon SES is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, especially for small businesses and startups.
Users appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of transactional and marketing emails.
It helps users avoid email reputation issues and deliver emails reliably.
Amazon SES easily integrates with various applications and languages, making it convenient for developers.
The API provided by Amazon SES is well-liked for email sending and automation.
Some users find the initial setup and configuration of Amazon SES to be complex, requiring technical expertise.
Amazon SES's region-based outbound email relay can be a drawback for some users who need more flexibility in migration.
Users have mentioned limited or email-only support as a downside. Fast resolution of issues may be a challenge.
Some users found the verification process and transitioning from a sandbox environment to a production environment challenging and time-consuming.
The SMTP server provided by Amazon SES may not be as powerful as some other options in the market.
Learning to use Amazon SES effectively can be a bit challenging and may require a strong technical understanding.
SendGrid ensures dependable email delivery, reducing bounce rates and enhancing customer communication.
User-friendly interface and clear documentation simplify integration.
Dynamic content personalization improves targeting and engagement.
Real-time performance tracking with open rates, click-through rates, and more aids optimization.
SendGrid's infrastructure efficiently handles variable email volumes.
Considered expensive, especially for dedicated servers.
Initial setup may be challenging for non-technical users.
Improved design features are desired.
Slow or unresponsive support at times.
Issues with email delivery to specific providers, causing spam marking.
Amazon SES is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, especially for small businesses and startups.
Users appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of transactional and marketing emails.
It helps users avoid email reputation issues and deliver emails reliably.
Amazon SES easily integrates with various applications and languages, making it convenient for developers.
The API provided by Amazon SES is well-liked for email sending and automation.
Some users find the initial setup and configuration of Amazon SES to be complex, requiring technical expertise.
Amazon SES's region-based outbound email relay can be a drawback for some users who need more flexibility in migration.
Users have mentioned limited or email-only support as a downside. Fast resolution of issues may be a challenge.
Some users found the verification process and transitioning from a sandbox environment to a production environment challenging and time-consuming.
The SMTP server provided by Amazon SES may not be as powerful as some other options in the market.
Learning to use Amazon SES effectively can be a bit challenging and may require a strong technical understanding.
Don't just take our word for it. Hear directly from users on G2 who have used
SendGrid
and
Amazon SES
firsthand
Sengrid has been such a wonderful system to use to keep track of the emails being sent out by our automatic system. The ability to check if emails bounced, have been blocked, if the emails were opened and even clicked on has been severly helpful in our efforts to educate our guests/customers about the importance of confirmation emails and accountability.
Mid-Market
I'm a full stack developer. I have used Twilio sendgrid at my one of project, in that project basically I have to varify that user when he or she registered. This service helped me to send the email for varification to that particular user. Some things are the best in sendgrid which I appreciate that, like it is open-source. I have faced some error, like you are unauthorised, I am not able to varify and Authorize myself.
Software Developer
We used to run our business email through the same mail servers as our product emails. It was a continual pain point. We would seem to end up in continual loop of blacklists and lobbying to get off of blacklists for seemingly no good reason. No longer with SES. Low volume of real people in business email and high volume of transactional emails through SES with no hassles.
Mid-Market
Our IT dept made the switch to Amazon SES about 1.5 years ago. Because SES we use to run tests and figure out email issues in the marketing department, which is not our job. It became our job when we saw low engagement. With SES we haven't brought up any issues with IT for a very long time. There are no dislikes; the best an email-sending service can do is deliver emails every time and fast. Marketer concentrating on email messaging is how we can best send our time.
VP of Online Marketing
