Looking for which Email provider will be the best for your use case among
Amazon SES
vs
Postmark
?
Compare
Amazon SES
vs
Postmark
head-to-head on factors such as their
features, pricing, latency, deliverability and more.
Introducing
Amazon SES
vs
Postmark
,
two industry leading Email vendors that are transforming the way businesses connect with their audience
A fully managed email service for sending & receiving large amounts of emails. Offers high deliverability, scalability, & cost-effectiveness. Best suited for larger businesses.
A fully managed email service for sending & receiving large amounts of emails. Offers high deliverability, scalability, & cost-effectiveness. Best suited for larger businesses.
In a market flooded with Email providers, selecting the one that suits your needs can be challenging. This comparative guide offers a swift overview of their offerings, making it easy for you to decide.
N/A
/webhooks
/v2/email/configuration-sets/ConfigurationSetName/event-destinations/
/messages/outbound
/v2/email/contact-lists/
N/A
/v2/email/outbound-emails
Docs
Docs
Paypal, Drupal, Typeform ++
Mailcoach, CraftCampaign, Customer.io + 14 others
Yes
Yes
N/A
/webhooks
/v2/email/configuration-sets/ConfigurationSetName/event-destinations/
/messages/outbound
/v2/email/contact-lists/
N/A
/v2/email/outbound-emails
Docs
Docs
Paypal, Drupal, Typeform ++
Mailcoach, CraftCampaign, Customer.io + 14 others
Yes
Yes
Every choice comes with its trade-offs. Let's break down the advantages and disadvantages of the providers for a clear decision making.
Amazon SES is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, especially for small businesses and startups.
Users appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of transactional and marketing emails.
It helps users avoid email reputation issues and deliver emails reliably.
Amazon SES easily integrates with various applications and languages, making it convenient for developers.
The API provided by Amazon SES is well-liked for email sending and automation.
Some users find the initial setup and configuration of Amazon SES to be complex, requiring technical expertise.
Amazon SES's region-based outbound email relay can be a drawback for some users who need more flexibility in migration.
Users have mentioned limited or email-only support as a downside. Fast resolution of issues may be a challenge.
Some users found the verification process and transitioning from a sandbox environment to a production environment challenging and time-consuming.
The SMTP server provided by Amazon SES may not be as powerful as some other options in the market.
Learning to use Amazon SES effectively can be a bit challenging and may require a strong technical understanding.
Postmark is highly praised for its reliability. Users find it to be a dependable solution for sending transactional emails.
The service is easy to integrate with other systems and APIs, making it a seamless choice for developers.
Users appreciate the high deliverability rate, ensuring that their important transactional emails reach recipients' inboxes promptly.
Postmark offers well-designed email templates that simplify the process of email campaigns, making it beneficial for marketing purposes as well.
The platform's user interface is intuitive and easy to use, providing a hassle-free experience.
Some users find the pricing to be on the higher side, which could be a consideration for those with budget constraints.
Postmark lacks an archiving feature, which could be a drawback for users who prefer to have this functionality in their transactional email service.
Postmark focuses on transactional emails, so it may not be suitable for those looking for a comprehensive email marketing solution.
Amazon SES is often praised for its cost-effectiveness, especially for small businesses and startups.
Users appreciate its ability to handle high volumes of transactional and marketing emails.
It helps users avoid email reputation issues and deliver emails reliably.
Amazon SES easily integrates with various applications and languages, making it convenient for developers.
The API provided by Amazon SES is well-liked for email sending and automation.
Some users find the initial setup and configuration of Amazon SES to be complex, requiring technical expertise.
Amazon SES's region-based outbound email relay can be a drawback for some users who need more flexibility in migration.
Users have mentioned limited or email-only support as a downside. Fast resolution of issues may be a challenge.
Some users found the verification process and transitioning from a sandbox environment to a production environment challenging and time-consuming.
The SMTP server provided by Amazon SES may not be as powerful as some other options in the market.
Learning to use Amazon SES effectively can be a bit challenging and may require a strong technical understanding.
Postmark is highly praised for its reliability. Users find it to be a dependable solution for sending transactional emails.
The service is easy to integrate with other systems and APIs, making it a seamless choice for developers.
Users appreciate the high deliverability rate, ensuring that their important transactional emails reach recipients' inboxes promptly.
Postmark offers well-designed email templates that simplify the process of email campaigns, making it beneficial for marketing purposes as well.
The platform's user interface is intuitive and easy to use, providing a hassle-free experience.
Some users find the pricing to be on the higher side, which could be a consideration for those with budget constraints.
Postmark lacks an archiving feature, which could be a drawback for users who prefer to have this functionality in their transactional email service.
Postmark focuses on transactional emails, so it may not be suitable for those looking for a comprehensive email marketing solution.
Don't just take our word for it. Hear directly from users on G2 who have used
Amazon SES
and
Postmark
firsthand
We used to run our business email through the same mail servers as our product emails. It was a continual pain point. We would seem to end up in continual loop of blacklists and lobbying to get off of blacklists for seemingly no good reason. No longer with SES. Low volume of real people in business email and high volume of transactional emails through SES with no hassles.
Mid-Market
Our IT dept made the switch to Amazon SES about 1.5 years ago. Because SES we use to run tests and figure out email issues in the marketing department, which is not our job. It became our job when we saw low engagement. With SES we haven't brought up any issues with IT for a very long time. There are no dislikes; the best an email-sending service can do is deliver emails every time and fast. Marketer concentrating on email messaging is how we can best send our time.
VP of Online Marketing
Postmark has come to change the way we send confirmation and transactional emails to our users. Purchase confirmation emails, user activation, and purchase reminders (you name them) ended up in the spam section, bounced or in the promotional folder of our clients. Thanks to Postmark, these emails arrive promptly and when users need them.
Marketing Lead
Much better than Sendgrid, which had endless deliverability problems even sending to e.g. Hotmail/Live.com addresses. UI is intuitive, use of 'sandbox' accounts is great for checking that your apps are sending messages correctly, and most importantly the actual deliverability is fantastic. Dedicated IPs are only available to a subset of customers, but you don't need one to get good deliverability (unlike with Sendgrid where, with exactly the same emails, we were seeing our IPs flagged for spam).
CTO
Compare email providers Mailchimp vs Amazon SES in 2024 on parameters such as features, pricing, APIs, reliability, uptime, and integration.
Compare email providers Mailgun vs Amazon SES in 2024 on parameters such as features, pricing, APIs, reliability, uptime, and integration.
Compare email providers Sendgrid vs Amazon SES in 2024 on parameters such as features, pricing, APIs, reliability, uptime, and integration.
