Engineering

Choosing the Best Database Cluster for Your Notification System for High Performance, Scalability and Reliability

Sanjeev Kumar
September 18, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS

The selection of database clusters is the key to reliability, efficiency, and scalability in the dynamic world of notification systems. A solid database infrastructure is essential for delivering accurate and timely notifications.

This guide provides a step-by-step procedure for selecting the optimum database cluster to drive your notification system, assuring seamless communication and maximum effectiveness.

Understanding Your Requirements: Key Factors to Consider

Choosing the appropriate database or database cluster is essential for any notification system. This part will discuss key factors and considerations while choosing the correct database or database cluster for your notification system.

Performance

Latency

Assume that a ride-sharing service uses notifications to let users know where their vehicle is. The notifications may not be received immediately if the database serving this system has a significant latency. Users might get location updates too late, which is frustrating and provides a bad user experience.

Throughput

Social media platforms quickly create notifications for likes, comments, and messages. Users may face delays in receiving these notifications if the database cannot manage high volume, which will lower their engagement and happiness.

Scalability

Vertical Scalability

Consider an online store that is having a flash sale. The system could break under a sudden spike in traffic if the database cannot be vertically scaled, preventing users from getting purchase confirmations and resulting in higher support queries.

Horizontal Scalability

The rate of user growth in a global messaging service is unpredictable. The system's capacity to scale horizontally allows it to add more servers to meet growing user registrations and message delivery rates, preserving service during periods of high demand

Reliability

Availability

Downtime caused by a database failure could lead to missed warnings, risking patient safety in a healthcare notification system and informing medical staff of critical patient situations.

Data durability

Transaction records are essential in financial applications. Financial notifications could be lost or damaged if data is not durably preserved, resulting in disagreements and user mistrust.

Security

Access Control

Inadequate access restrictions could allow unauthorized individuals to examine critical financial information in a banking app that sends transaction notifications, endangering consumer privacy and trust.

Encryption

High-level encryption is required for any database which can ensure safety of data and calculations to avoid any data leaks or penalty while being compliant with the different data laws.

Cost

License and Support Costs

A startup creating a notification system might not have a lot of funding. Selecting a database with expensive licensing and support fees could strain the finances and impede expansion.

Infrastructure expenses

Suppose a media streaming service employs a database that isn't efficient. In that case, it may have to invest in server infrastructure to maintain performance during peak usage, which may drive operational costs.

Operational Complexity

Ease of Management 

Managing a complicated database in a tiny startup with a limited technical staff could take too much time and effort, removing resources from product development and improvement.

Monitoring and Debugging Tools

Without the proper monitoring and debugging tools, finding and fixing performance problems in a large-scale notification system can take a long time, resulting in protracted service interruptions.

Types of Databases Suitable for Notification Systems

The different types of databases and database clusters suitable for notification systems, along with their advantages and disadvantages:

Type Examples Advantages Disadvantages
Relational Databases MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle
  1. Structured Data
  2. ACID Compliance
  3. Mature Ecosystem
  1. Limited Scalability
  2. Complex Schema Evolution
  3. Higher Overheads
NoSQL Databases MongoDB, Cassandra
  1. High Scalability
  2. Flexible Data Models
  3. High Availability
  1. Lack of ACID Compliance
  2. Learning Curve
  3. Limited Query Capabilities
NewSQL Databases Google Cloud Spanner, Amazon Aurora
  1. Scalability with ACID Compliance
  2. Global Distribution
  3. High Availability
  1. Complexity and Cost
  2. Potential Learning Curve
  3. Limited Ecosystem

Exploring Popular Databases for Notification Systems

Selecting a suitable database is critical when architecting a notification system. In this section, we will compare various databases for Notification Systems.

Factors Relational Database NoSQL Database Serverless/ NewSQL Database
MySQL Cluster Oracle Database PostgreSQL Microsoft SQL Server Cassandra MongoDB Redis Elasticsearch Firebase Realtime Database Google Cloud Spanner Amazon Aurora
Scalability
Horizontal Limited Excellent Excellent Limited Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Vertical Excellent Limited Excellent Limited Limited Limited Excellent Limited Limited Limited Limited
Global No Limited Limited Limited Yes Limited Limited Limited Yes No
Performance
Latency Lower to Moderate Low-latency Low to Moderate Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency Low-latency
Throughput Moderate to High High Moderate to High High High High High High Moderate to High High High
Consistency Model Strong ACID compliance Strong ACID compliance Strong ACID compliance Strong ACID compliance Tunable consistency levels Tunable consistency levels Strong ACID compliance Eventual Consistency Strong ACID compliance Strong ACID compliance Strong ACID compliance
Durability
Durability High Very High Very High Very High High High Very High Very High High Exceptionally High Very High
Availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability High availability
Security
Encryption At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit At Rest & In Transit
Authentication MySQL Password-Based Authentication Password-Based Authentication Window Authentication User Access User Access User Access Custom Roles & Privileges Firebase Authentication SSL/TLS AWS-IAM
Authorization Fine-Grained Roles & Privileges Fine-Grained Role-Based Role-Based Roles & Privileges Role-Based Custom Roles & Privileges Firebase Authorization Custom Roles & Privileges IAM-Based
Cost
Hardware Costs Affordable May be Significant Affordable Affordable Affordable May be Significant Affordable May have Higher Upfront Costs Included in Service Cost Included in Service Cost Included in Service Cost
Maintenance Costs Generally Low May be Significant Generally Low Generally Low Generally Low May be Significant Generally Low Included in Service Cost Included in Service Cost Included in Service Cost Included in Service Cost
Cloud Costs N/A (Assumes On-Premise) Pay-per-Use Model N/A (Assumes On-Premise) Pay-per-Use Model N/A (Assumes On-Premise) Pay-per-Use Model Pay-per-Use Model Pay-per-Use Model Pay-per-Use Model Pay-per-Use Model Pay-per-Use Model
Database Evaluation Factor
Benchmarking Good Excellent Good Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent Excellent
Performance Testing Stress Failover Load, Stress, Failover Stress Failover Load, Stress, Failover Load, Stress, Failover Load, Stress, Failover Load, Stress, Failover Load, Stress, Failover Load, Stress, Failover
TCO Analysis Load Moderate May Have Higher Licensing Costs Cost-effective at Scale May Have Higher Upfront Costs Cost-effective at Scale May Have Higher Licensing Costs Cost-effective for AWS Users Cost-effective for AWS Users Cost-effective for AWS Users May Have Higher Upfront Costs Cost-effective for AWS Users
Use Case Suitability Structured data and complex queries Enterprise-Grade Applications Structured data and complex queries High-write, high-throughput applications High-write, high-throughput applications High-write, high-throughput applications Global applications with strong consistency WS-Hosted Application Event-Driven, Real-time Applications Global applications with strong consistency AWS-Hosted Application
MySQL Cluster Oracle Database PostgreSQL Microsoft SQL Server Cassandra MongoDB Redis Elasticsearch Firebase Realtime Database Google Cloud Spanner Amazon Aurora
Operational Complexity
Ease of Management Requires manual configuration and management Comprehensive management tools and automation Requires manual configuration and management Managed service with automated scaling and replication Complex configuration due to distributed nature Comprehensive management tools and automation Complex configuration due to distributed nature Provides managed services with automatic scaling and replication Managed service with automated scaling and replication Provides managed services with automatic scaling and replication Managed service with automated scaling and replication
Monitoring & Debugging Tools Percona Monitoring & Management Oracle Enterprise Manager Oracle Enterprise Manager SQL Server Management Studio Cassandra Reaper MongoDB Cloud Manager RedisInsight Kibana Firebase Console Stackdriver Monitoring AWS CloudWatch
Database Management
Data Partitioning Sharding Sharding Table Partitioning Table Partitioning Sharding Sharding No Partitioning Sharding No Partitioning Automatic Sharding Replication & Sharding
Geographic Distribution Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited No Yes Limited
Data Retention Policies Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited Yes Yes
Multi-Tenancy Limited Limited Limited Limited Limited Yes Limited Limited Yes Yes Limited
Real-time Processing
Real-Time Analytics Event Trigger-based Complex Event Processing (CEP) Stream Processing Complex Event Processing (CEP) Stream Processing Stream Processing Pub/Sub Stream Processing Firebase Realtime Database SDKs Stream Processing Stream Processing
Push Notification Support No Native Support Oracle Notification Services PL/pgSQL SQL Server Notification Service No Native Support Mobile Push Notification Mobile Push Notification Web Sockets Firebase Cloud Messaging Push Notification through Cloud Functions Amazon SNS
Message Queues MySQL Replication Advanced Queueing Asynchronous Notification Service Broker Apache Kafka No Native Support Redis Pub/Sub Apache Kafka Firebase Cloud Messaging Google Cloud Pub/Sub Amazon SQS
Integration & Compatability
API Integration Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Message Queue Integration Supported MySQL Replication Oracle Advanced Queuing RabbitMQ, Kafka RabbitMQ, Kafka Apache Kafka RabbitMQ, Kafka RabbitMQ, Kafka RabbitMQ, Kafka No Native Support Google Cloud Pub/Sub Amazon SQS
Scalable Worker Framework Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Latency Variation Low Low Low Low Very Low Low Low Very Low Low Low Low

Case Studies with Real-World Examples

Use Case 1: Startup: Ride-Sharing App (Using MongoDB - NoSQL)

A startup is developing a ride-sharing app that is comparable to Uber or Lyft, and it requires a notification system to notify customers when drivers arrive when rides have been confirmed, and when there are special discounts available.

The startup requires a database that can support many concurrent users and real-time notifications because it expects a significant increase in users. 

For their use-case, MongoDB, a NoSQL database will be a suitable choice renowned for its scalability and flexibility. They can efficiently store and retrieve user data, ride information, and notification preferences because of MongoDB's document-oriented model.

Use Case 2: Mid-Sized Company: E-commerce Platform (Using Amazon Aurora - NewSQL)

A mid-sized e-commerce company wants to develop an effective notification system for order updates, product recommendations, and cart abandonment reminders as it expands its online store.

In addition to guaranteeing high availability and dependability for order notifications, they want a database that can execute complicated searches for customized product recommendations.

For this use-case, Amazon Aurora, an AWS NewSQL database would be a suitable choice. Aurora offers the scalability they require for recommendation engines' complicated queries and expanding user base.

Use Case 3: Financial Services Provider (Using Oracle DataBase - Relational)

A major financial services company needs a notification service to notify customers of account activity, fraud detection, and financial updates.

Compliance and security are crucial for the financial sector. The service provider ensures that notifications are sent securely, and data integrity is upheld.

The company can use Twilio for SMS notifications and a highly secure on-premises Oracle Database to store sensitive client data.

Best Practices for Deploying and Managing a Notification System Database

Step 1: Implement Redundant Storage

  • To provide data redundancy and high availability, use replication and backups.
  • Create a failover system so that you can transition to a backup database in the event of a primary server failure.

Step 2: Establish Caching Mechanisms

  • Reduce the burden on the database by using caching tools like Redis or Memcached to store frequently retrieved data.
  • Utilize appropriate cache invalidation techniques to guarantee data consistency.

Step 3: Enhance the database schema

  • Per the particular requirements of the notification system, normalize or denormalize the database structure.
  • Do not create irrationally complex associations that may affect query performance.

Step 4: Indexing to Improve Query Performance

  • To speed up data retrieval, create appropriate indexes on columns often utilized in queries.
  • Review and improve indexes frequently to reflect shifting usage trends.

Step 5: Monitor and fine-tune performance

  • Set up monitoring tools to keep tabs on database performance, quickly spotting and fixing bottlenecks.
  • Regularly tune performance by modifying setups under usage trends.

Step 6: Large Tables Partition

  • Using particular criteria (such as a date range), separate huge tables into more digestible, smaller sections.
  • This could improve maintenance procedures and query performance.

Step 7: Processing Non-Critical Data in Batch

  • To lessen the immediate burden on the database, consider using batch processing for non-real-time data.
  • Plan less important chores for off-peak times.

Step 8: Rate-limiting implementation

  • To avoid a high volume of requests from overwhelming the database, impose rate limitations on requests.
  • To manage access, employ sliding windows or token buckets.

Step 9: Make use of Connection Pooling

  • Reduce overhead by effectively managing and reusing database connections with connection pooling.

Step 10: Disaster recovery and routine backups

  • To prevent data loss, create a solid backup and disaster recovery plan.
  • Regularly test backups to make sure they can be reliably restored.

Step 11: Security precautions

  • Implement stringent access controls to guarantee that only authorized users have the necessary access.
  • To prevent unauthorized access, encrypt sensitive data in transit and at rest.

Step 12: Automated Routine Upkeep

  • To keep the database optimal, schedule regular maintenance operations, including index rebuilding, statistics updates, and data cleansing.

Step 13: Sharing of knowledge and documentation

  • Keep thorough records of all database configurations, schemas, and processes.
  • To enable effective management, make sure the team shares the knowledge.

Integrating DataBase to Message Broker

Sending messages to the message broker while integrating a database as a producer:

  • Identify Events: Determine which database events, such as inserts, updates, and deletions, will cause messages.
  • Implement Database Triggers or Change Data Capture (CDC): Using database-specific techniques to start events when data changes. For instance, MySQL supports triggers, and PostgreSQL includes LISTEN/NOTIFY.
  • Create Messages: Create messages in a language your message broker can comprehend, such as JSON or Avro, in response to database events.
  • Connect to Broker: Use the client libraries or SDK for the message broker to establish a connection. These libraries typically offer ways to transmit messages.
  • Send Messages: Send a message to the message broker whenever a database event takes place.

Conclusion

Selecting the appropriate database clusters for a notification system is an important choice that affects the system's performance, scalability, and dependability. Organizations are able to make well-informed decisions by taking into account aspects like performance, scalability, data model, consistency, availability, security, cost-effectiveness, and long-term growth. To ensure the chosen clusters match the demands of the notification system, benchmarking, testing, and regular maintenance are crucial stages.

Written by:
Sanjeev Kumar
Engineering, SuprSend
Get a powerful notification engine with SuprSend
Build smart notifications across channels in minutes with a single API and frontend components
Implement a powerful stack for your notifications
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.